FATCA Archives - Page 2 of 4 - TAX CONTROVERSY 360

IRS Is Underutilizing Exchange of Information Capabilities

by McDermott Will & Emery | Sep 21, 2017 | IRS Guidance, Uncategorized

According to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is underutilizing exchange of information (EOI) capabilities with foreign countries. On September 11, 2017, TIGTA issued a report summarizing its evaluation of the IRS’s current efforts to improve tax compliance by using information obtained from foreign countries through the Exchange of Information Program agreements.

TIGTA’s three main conclusions were: (1) the automatic exchange of information (AEOI) recordkeeping is inadequate and the usefulness of the information is unknown; (2) the Mutual Collection Assistance Request Program (MCAR) may not be used to its full potential; and (3) the spontaneous exchange of information program requires a multitude of enhancements.

TIGTA made several recommendations to the IRS to maximize the use of information received and collection assistance available from foreign countries. The recommendations included:

(1) Conduct an outreach to examination and collection field functions to alert them on the availability and potential usefulness of automatic data provided by treaty partners that can be gained by requesting and obtaining access to an easy search tool;

(2) Expand upon the AEOI Program section of the Internal Revenue Manual (§ 4.60.1) to add recordkeeping requirements to track the incoming and outgoing records;

(3) Create procedures for AEOI personnel that: a) allow AEOI personnel to accurately track the data and/or record counts received by country; b) track the data by country that contractors upload to the AEOI database; and c) monitor the difference in received and posted record counts by country to identify and resolve upload issues in a timely fashion;

(4) Reinforce the IRS’s 2016 international collection strategy related to the MCAR Program to address the importance of issuing MCARs when warranted as an additional collection tool, and prioritize the timely processing of outgoing MCAR requests;

(5) Enhance revenue officers’ awareness of tools to explore international asset identification;

(6) Coordinate with Treasury Department’s Office of Tax Policy to identify additional countries with whom the United States could benefit by adopting MCAR provisions in a treaty; and

(7) Establish criteria for withdrawing issued outbound MCARs when the taxpayer has not fully paid.

The IRS agreed with TIGTA’s recommendations and plans to address those issues by implementing several corrective actions by the summer of 2018.

The final report entitled “Exchange of Information Capabilities Are Underutilized by the Internal Revenue Service” and the IRS’s response to an earlier draft is available here.

Practice Point: The information exchanged among tax administrations has increased significantly since the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). The TIGTA report identified several areas in which the exchange of information is currently being underutilized by the IRS. The IRS is clued into these flaws and is focused on updates to maximize the value of the information. As we previously discussed, the IRS recently announced two new enforcement initiatives in the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) to use FATCA [...]

Continue Reading

IRS Criminal Investigation Division Announces Two New Initiatives

by Kevin Spencer and McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 25, 2017 | IRS Guidance, Uncategorized

In a press call on August 2, 2017, the Chief of the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Criminal Investigation Division (CID), John D. Fort, announced two new enforcement initiatives: a National Coordinated Investigations Unit and an International Tax Enforcement Group.

The National Coordinated Investigations Unit is intended to be, in Fort’s words, a “cutting edge” group answering directly to CID’s management. It is intended to harness data already being gathered by the IRS’s civil departments to identify areas of non-compliance, so that major investigations can be coordinated at a national level.

The first three areas of inquiry for the new unit will be international tax enforcement, employment tax enforcement and microcap stock fraud (an effort that will be coordinated with the Security and Exchange Commission). In Fort’s words, these efforts will generate “must-work referrals that come out of this group to the field offices.” International tax and employment tax enforcement are already longstanding CID priorities, so it will be interesting to see how CID’s use of data analytics will further those goals and whether greater coordination at the national level will result. (more…)

Record Numbers Are Giving Up US Citizenship

by McDermott Will & Emery and Kevin Spencer | Aug 8, 2017 | Uncategorized

The US government has reported that more than 1,750 people gave up US citizenship in the second quarter of 2017.

Tax practitioners speculate that the increase in expatriations is likely due to ever-increasing tax and financial reporting and compliance requirements. For example, the 2010 Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act requires overseas banks to disclose financial information to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about US citizen-owned accounts. US citizens who live overseas must comply with numerous reporting regimes regarding foreign financial assets and their sources of income. Failure to comply comes with steep penalties.

Practice Point: Expatriation from a tax perspective can be a very complicated endeavor. It is essential to consult with a tax professional that understands the rules and can assist in the efficient and effective renouncing of US citizenship.

You Must Comply: IRS LB&I Reveals Details of Its Inbound Distributor and OVDP Decline-Withdrawal Campaigns

by Kristina Novak | May 15, 2017 | IRS Guidance, Transfer Pricing Resource, Uncategorized

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Large Business and International Division (LB&I) hosted a webinar with the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA) regarding LB&I’s recently-announced campaigns targeting inbound distributors and taxpayers who either were declined by, or withdrew from, the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP). Our previous coverage of LB&I’s campaign initiatives can be found here. The slides from the presentation are available here.

Inbound Distributors

As described by the IRS, this campaign is intended to address transfer pricing in the context of United States distributors of goods sourced from foreign-related parties that may have reported gains or losses that are not commensurate with the functions performed and the risk assumed.

As discussed in Wednesday’s webinar, this campaign is somewhat unique in that the IRS is still evaluating whether this issue presents an actual—rather than a mere potential—threat of noncompliance. The IRS has identified a series of returns to be sent into the field for examination, but is currently holding them to evaluate whether a genuine threat of noncompliance exists. The IRS also stated that the campaign is being designed to allow for flexibility to release returns quickly, if compliance can be readily ascertained. (more…)

World Taxing Authorities Prepare to Attack

by McDermott Will & Emery and Kevin Spencer | Aug 17, 2016 | IRS Audits, IRS Guidance, Transfer Pricing Resource, Uncategorized

Global tax policy has evolved dramatically, with multinational corporations coming under attack from all directions. To respond to budget deficits and economic austerity, worldwide taxing authorities are deploying a new weapon: information exchange. As multinational corporations struggle to remain compliant and competitive in a world where effective tax rate management can be a critical element of cost control, what does this evolution mean for your business?

To find out, read the full article here.

IRS UPDATES FATCA FAQs

by McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 15, 2016 | IRS Guidance, Uncategorized

On August 8, 2016, the IRS updated the “frequently asked questions” (FAQs) on the FATCA IDES Technical FAQs section at IRS.gov.

IDES stands for the “International Data Exchange Services” system that allows the IRS to exchange taxpayer information with foreign tax authorities. While the FAQs are focused primarily on technical issues, such as data preparation, testing and security, several of the revisions provide guidance on substantive FATCA reporting issues.

New Q:A18 clarifies that reports made by “Direct Reporting Non-Financial Foreign Entities” (NFFE) located in Model One IGA jurisdictions are to be made directly to the IRS rather than through their Host Country Tax Authority (HCTA). Generally when using IDES, files uploaded by a foreign financial institution (FFI) in a “M1O2” jurisdiction will be routed to the HCTA. The FAQ provides that “when a Direct Reporting NFFE applies for its Global Intermediary Identification Number(GIIN) through the FATCA Online Registration portal it must specify its jurisdiction as ‘Other’ if it is located in a M1O2 jurisdiction.” The GIIN assigned as a result of this registration option then instructs IDES to route transmissions directly to the IRS.

M1O2 stands for “Model 1, Option 2” which enables FFIs located in jurisdictions with Model 1 IGAs to report directly through IDES rather than to their HCTA, if such procedure is permitted by their HCTA.

The IRS also updated Q:C20, which deals with “nil” FATCA reports (i.e., FATCA reports in which no US accounts are reported). The revised FAQ confirms that generally, only Direct Reporting Non-Financial Foreign Entities and Sponsoring Entities’ reporting on behalf of a Sponsored Direct Reporting NFFEs are required to submit a nil report. Nil reports are optional for all other filers. The FAQ clarifies that while nil reporting may not be required by the IRS, it may be required by the local jurisdiction under that jurisdiction’s FATCA legislation, and reminds taxpayers to consult with local tax administration before filing FATCA reports.

The IRS continues to periodically update both the technical and substantive FATCA FAQs on its website to provide guidance to affected entities as compliance issues arise.